My Initial Reactions
My reaction to Case-based Reasoning (CBR) was very positive. This was another model which I had implemented elements of without knowing the formal term. The context-based models seem very natural ways to learn, and I thought CBR, with the connection to various cases and stories, would be a model I could see being used in many different educational settings. The steps to the CBR (retrieve, reuse, revise and retain) seemed to provide a needed structure to the exploration.I found Cognitive Flexibility Theory to be a challenging model. It involves learning in complex, even messy contexts-thus learning is interconnected as opposed to the more linear compartmentalized traditional approach in covering units of content. The component of Cognitive Flexibility Theory (CFT) I find most appealing is the focus on the transfer of complex knowledge. This was clear in the Plantation Letters sample lesson we worked through as students. Learners started with the accounts about the plantation letters, but quickly progressed to questions about evaluating the information on the letters and the questions about public health. The learners would take the knowledge gained from the previous scenarios and apply it to create a disaster response plan. The lesson was designed to give a lot of different contexts for the knowledge and learning as well as yield multiple perspectives in an interactive online environment-which it clearly did.
Finally I was familiar with Learning Objects prior to the course, but found the section and materials did increase my knowledge on the subject. I am interested in the ways Learning Objects and the sharing of Learning Objects might continue to progress. The sharing of these resources might be a great benefit to instructors in online environments.
Similarities and Differences
These models all reminded me of each other and some other models we've studying with the common focus on context, elements of real-world scenarios and problem solving. Goal-Based Scenarios and Anchored Instruction from the last unit have elements of the exploration and problem solving (you might even go back to the PBL model). While CFT lacks the structure of the GBS and Anchored Instruction models, it is clearly in the same family. Case-based Reasoning is also about contextual learning and would belong in the same group. Learning Objects is in a different category because it is not a learning theory or model but instead resources you might use in a learning theory. Another difference is while many of these models we've recently explored depend on context, a drawback of using Learning Objects may be the loss of context. However some kind of Learning Object could be used appropriately in any of these courses and was a good topic to bring closure to the course.
Would You Use It?
Like most of learning theories we explored this semester, I think there are areas of content these models would be very appropriate for and may make units of study much more engaging and interdisciplinary. However I think CBR would be a little easier to use and think there may be challenges to setting up the CFT model. Challenging isn't bad but the success of CFT in a course or class might hinge on the learners and how prepared they may be to undertake this new model. In addition, the instructor in a CFT lesson would want to be very clear about what the outcomes would be and how learning would be measured because it does lack the structure of a CBR lesson. I could see using Learning Objects if I could find a quality resource that fit my course. If so, I would gladly use Learning Objects, but would caution a Learning Object that doesn't fit the context of the learning or is poor quality would do more harm than good in many courses.
Web-based Tools and Resources
I've listed several tools in these blog posts and both the Case-based Reasoning and Cognitive Flexibility Theory seem to be better suited for a platform rather than a tool. Because the learner would be exploring cases or pages of content it would be good to have a site or platform. The "Plantation Letters" Ning was a good example of the kind of interactive platform that would best be used for these learning models. I think it might be best to find one platform like Moodle, WordPress, Edmodo or Google Apps that offer many ways to communicate, create webpages of content and post resources. You also might be able to accomplish the same environment with a wiki site-which again would allow for the creation of several pages. Two good sites for free wikis are wikispaces and pbworks.
Finally, Learning Objects are available but you'll need to search to find the right fit for your course. Here are some sites to get you started:
- MERLOT is great place to look for free and open resources for higher education.
- The North Carolina Learning Object Repository (NCLOR) is a little "hit and miss" but it is worth checking out for shared learning objects.
- Another site to check out with a lot of content is the OER Commons . It's a good source for both K12 and higher ed, but you'll need to devote some time to explore.
- Finally Creative Commons has a page devoted to listing OER Resources . Again there are several sites here and some may be better quality than others but it's worth looking into.
Thank you again for all of the great resources that you have mentioned in your post. I will certainly be checking them out. I think that you did a great job relating the theories from this unit to some of the earlier ones we have studied. You make a good point about Learning Objects. If they don't fit in well, it might be a waste of time for students causing more harm than good. Finally, you make a good connection with the Cog-Flex activity we participated in.
ReplyDeleteHi Emory ~
ReplyDeleteGreat post! The CFT model really does show how complex learning can be and how different opinions can be brought out from the same content. The fact that we had to post our comments for others to read, really helped to drive that point home. So often when we do projects, we don't get to see the other perspectives of our fellow students.
I also agree that Learning Objects can be a great tool but can also do more harm than good in some cases. I actually had that happen in one of my online classes and I had to pull the LO's out of the course.
Great post!
Kelly
Excellent coverage of the models/theories and how they could be intertwined through your own teaching. I too liked the Cognitive Flex Theory and the transference of knowledge potential it showed. This was as close to authentic learning as I think possible in a semi structured way...not just linear, but every which way.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your resources of Learning Objects. Before this section, Though it made great sense and I am sure we all have a stash of resources for multi faceted use, I had never given formal thought beyond my classroom and those in my PLC groups to share them with the world.
Thank you again for the additional resources.
Keith Murphy
Emory,
ReplyDeleteExcellent post, very well written. I think Case-based Reasoning (CBR) is much more structured and I agree with you that it is a very natural learning process. Learning is always interesting, when there are cases and stories where they can directly relate to their learning process. Prior knowledge and resources, sample projects helps them as a guide to go through this learning process.
CFT is very complex as I mentioned in all my posts...most us agree on this point. Transfer of knowledge from one context to another is challenging. I agree with you that going through the plantation letters and transferring them to modern day scenarios was a challenge indeed!
Thanks for the list of resources, I have been to MERLOT conference and it is really a great resource for instructional designers and educators. Merlot pedagogy portal (http://pedagogy.merlot.org/) is always helpful. North Carolina Learning Object Repository (NCLOR) is also something community colleges use when developing online courses.
Thanks for such a great post!
---Jakia
Emory,
ReplyDeleteI agree that the use of CFT in the plantation letters created a much larger diversity of opinions and discussions than I have seen in many of the past assignments. It definitely fosters such independent evaluations of the material and the reasoning behind the conclusions reached by ourselves and our classmates.
Thanks for the list of resources!
Lyn
Thanks so much for bringing in the open educational resources (OER) links, too! When we talk about learning objects, OERs clearly come to mind, since they represent learning objects that are open/free/available for anyone to use for their teaching/learning. This is an area of emerging research in teaching and learning with technology, so thanks for sharing those links!
ReplyDeleteBiljana